BACKGROUND Ablation of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains challenging, with a lower success rate than paroxysmal AF. A reliable ablation endpoint has not been demonstrated yet, although AF termination during ablation may be associated with higher long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether the method of AF termination during ablation predicts mode of recurrence or long-term outcome. METHODS Three hundred six patients with long-standing persistent AF, free of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), undergoing a first radiofrequency ablation (pulmonary vein [PV] antrum isolation and complex fractionated atrial electrograms) were prospectively included. Organized atrial tachyarrhythmias (AT) that occurred during AF ablation were targeted. AF termination mode during ablation was studied in relation to other variables (characteristics of arrhythmia recurrence, redo procedures, the use of adenosine/isoproterenol for redo, and comparison of focal versus macroreentrant ATs). Long-term maintenance of SR was assessed during the follow-up. RESULTS During AF ablation, six of 306 patients converted directly to SR, 172 patients organized into AT (with 38 of them converting in SR with further ablation), and 128 did not organize or terminate and were cardioverted. Two hundred eleven of 306 patients (69%) maintained in long-term SR without AADs after a mean follow-up of 25 +/- 6.9 months, with no statistical difference between the various AF termination modes during ablation. Presence or absence of organization during ablation clearly predicted the predominant mode of recurrence, respectively, AT or AF (P = .022). Among the 74 redo ablation patients, 24 patients (32%) had extra PV triggers revealed by adenosine/isoproterenol. Termination of focal ATs was correlated with higher long-term success rate (24/29, 83%) than termination of macroreentrant ATs (20/35, 57%; P = .026). CONCLUSION AF termination during ablation (conversion to AT or SR) could predict the mode of arrhythmia recurrence (AT vs. AF) but did not impact the long-term SR maintenance after one or two procedures. AT termination with further ablation did not correlate with better long-term outcome, except with focal ATs, for which termination seems critical.
通讯机构:[1]St Davids Med Ctr, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Inst, Austin, TX 78705 USA[4]Univ Texas Austin, Dept Biomed Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA[12]Calif Pacific Med Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA[*1]St Davids Med Ctr, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Inst, 1015 E 32nd St,Suite 516, Austin, TX 78705 USA
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Elayi Claude S.,Di Biase Luigi,Barrett Conor,et al.Atrial fibrillation termination as a procedural endpoint during ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation[J].HEART RHYTHM.2010,7(9):1216-1223.doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.038.
APA:
Elayi, Claude S.,Di Biase, Luigi,Barrett, Conor,Ching, Chi Keong,al Aly, Moataz...&Natale, Andrea.(2010).Atrial fibrillation termination as a procedural endpoint during ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.HEART RHYTHM,7,(9)
MLA:
Elayi, Claude S.,et al."Atrial fibrillation termination as a procedural endpoint during ablation in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation".HEART RHYTHM 7..9(2010):1216-1223