单位:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tongji Med Coll, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China放射科华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院[2]Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
Background Accurate differentiation between intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is needed because treatment and prognosis differ significantly. Purpose To explore whether volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis can provide additional value to dynamic enhanced MRI in differentiating IMCC from HCC. Study Type Retrospective. Population In all, 131 patients with pathologically proven IMCC (n = 33) or HCC (n = 98). Field Strength/Sequence 3.0T MRI/conventional T-1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2WI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with b value of 800 sec/mm(2), dynamic enhanced MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine. Assessment Dynamic enhanced MR images were analyzed by two independent reviewers using a five-point scale to determine the diagnosis. Volumetric ADC assessments were performed independently by two radiologists to obtain different histogram parameters for each lesion. Quantitative histogram parameters were compared between the IMCC group and HCC group. Diagnostic performance of dynamic enhanced MRI, volumetric ADC histogram analysis, and the combination of both were analyzed. Statistical Tests Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis, independent Student's t-test, or Mann-Whitney U-test, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves analysis, and McNemar test. Results The sensitivity and specificity for dynamic enhanced MRI to differentiate IMCC from HCC were 82.1% and 82.6%, respectively. For all volumetric ADC histogram parameters, the 75th percentile ADC (ADC(75%)) had the highest AUC (0.791) in differentiating IMCC from HCC, with sensitivity and specificity of 69.7% and 77.6%, respectively. When combining dynamic enhanced MRI with ADC(75%), the sensitivity and specificity were 82.1% and 91.9%, respectively. Compared to dynamic enhanced MRI alone, the specificity for combined dynamic enhanced MRI and ADC(75%) was significantly increased (P = 0.008). Data Conclusion Volumetric ADC histogram analysis provides additional value to dynamic enhanced MRI in differentiating IMCC from HCC.
基金:
National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701657, 81571642, 81501447, 81771801]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017KFYXJJ126]
第一作者单位:[1]Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Radiol, Tongji Med Coll, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Zou Xianlun,Luo Yan,Li Zhen,et al.Volumetric Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis in Differentiating Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J].JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING.2019,49(4):975-983.doi:10.1002/jmri.26253.
APA:
Zou, Xianlun,Luo, Yan,Li, Zhen,Hu, Yao,Li, Haojie...&Kamel, Ihab R..(2019).Volumetric Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis in Differentiating Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma.JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING,49,(4)
MLA:
Zou, Xianlun,et al."Volumetric Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis in Differentiating Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma".JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 49..4(2019):975-983